Clericalism is a model of leadership that disempowers those who are led or served, and turns them into clients and dependents. This is opposed to ministry, in which one uses gifts and powers of leadership to empower others, to teach them, to draw out their capacities, so that one can enter into a relationship of mutuality. …
This understanding of ministry does not mean that there aren’t structures, or that certain people aren’t chosen to lead at times; it simply means that the mandate of leadership is to nurture the community into mutual ministry, rather than to disempower the community and make its people into dependents.
The attempt of basic Christian communities to overcome this clericalism is relevant to feminism because what disempowers women in ministry is clericalism, which is built on the patriarchal model of relationships. Women will always be disempowered in ministry as long as ministry is understood in terms of patriarchal clericalism.
The most critical focus for feminism in the church is precisely the liberation of the church itself from patriarchy. Women in the church cannot really rest with a clerical,
patriarchal church. They must struggle to convert the church to an understanding of its mission, which will include the full promotion of the humanity of women. The church must come to recognize that patriarchy is fundamentally contrary to the gospel and that the liberation of humanity from patriarchy is in fact an intrinsic aspect of the mission of the church itself.
Posts Tagged 'feminism'
Ministry without Hierarchy
Published January 12, 2010 Uncategorized 7 CommentsTags: clericalism, egalitarian, equality, feminism, House Church, mutual ministry, organic church, Sojourners
Cross-Gender Friendships – Too Hot for Christians?
Published November 14, 2008 Emergent , Friendship , Publishing 39 CommentsTags: ABA, CBA, chaste, chastity, Chip MacGregor, Christ, cross-gender friendships, Dan Brennan, Emergent, emerging church, feminine, feminism, feminist, friends, friendships, gender, Jesus, male-female friendships, masculine, men, opposite sex friendship, platonic, publishers, Publishing, sexuality, When Harry Met Sally, women
My friend Dan Brennan has written provocative and paradigm-shifting book on healthy, intimate female-male friendships in the Body of Christ. It’s kinda controversial; he actually thinks, contra to When Harry Met Sally, that men and women, single and married, can enjoy deep, abiding friendships that not only don’t hinder marriages (for any parties that happen to be married), but they actually help marriage. And further, that cross-gender-friendships are a core part of redemption and God’s New Covenant. And that Jesus wants us to have friends of the opposite sex. His wife agrees. (He’s blogged through a lot of the material here; I highly recommend going through his cross-gender friendship archives and giving ’em a read)
So Dan just got picked up by agent extraordinaire Chip MacGregor, and they’ll be shopping this manuscript around to the right publishers.
Today on his blog Dan asks the question, “Is this book too edgy for even emerging church crowds?”
Our fears of sexuality may not fall into neat categories of emerging or something else. Is it a story of risk? You betcha. Does it involve compelling mystery? Yeah, no formulas or six easy steps. Does it bring up strong emotional reactions? Sure it does. Is it a way of love and healing? Well, yes it is. Love and healing. That’s pretty edgy anytime.
I concur. Read more here.
Recent Comments